The distorted reality of Danderyd’s identity, they are ” their kind of people!”

Fokus magazine has done a great and in-depth analysis of life quality in the different municipalities in Sweden which has been published and addressed in many media. 30 factors were taken into consideration among them we find the care of older citizens, the local tax level, the climate for entrepreneurship, the number of low educated citizens, alcohol related death causes, areas with environmental protection, the number of registered crimes, divorces, suicide attempts, number of teachers in the school classes, unemployment, culture and leisure activities, people’s financial assets etc etc. so far so good!

The sun always shines over Djursholm (part of Danderyd) the old expression says. It still is because in this third attempt to rank the different municipalities (290) in Sweden, Danderyd has taken the first place. It is the municipality that has the richest inhabitants, the students with the best grades and the most expensive houses. “We have earned this distinction municipal commissioner Gunnar Ooms says, There are many who have contributed to what the municipality is today and our greatest asset is the Danderyd population themselves. We have worked hard to make the service to its inhabitants both good and cost effective.

Oh yes, Danderyd knows how to take care of itself! With the focus on ITSELF!

Because it is here that we find the problem with the kind of life-quality analyses as done by Fokus magazine, they only focus on the well being of the own population in regards to possibilities, privileges, numbers and growth factors. Nothing in the research is relating to responsibilities! Suppose we would start ranking our different municipalities in regard to their ability to make an impact on the visible and invisible needs of our society and nation as a whole. Which municipality would then be considered to be the number one in the nation?

Self. That’s the word I was looking for:“self”.

I think the deepest value of the average Danderyd person is so wonderfully and un-thoughtfully expressed (exposed) by Lüüli Lundvall Klebe who is sitting outside her villa. She has received a special distinction from the Djursholm villa association for her beautiful garden and tells that she has to be really active to counter the hired hands that take care of the neighbor’s garden. She likes the fellowship (cohesion) in the municipality. “We who live here are of another kind, a class separate from others, which gives a good solidarity”.

As I quote her words, I have said it all… Danderyd is taking care of itself!

In the last seven (7) years Danderyd has received twelve (12!) refugees in their municipality to be compared to Södertälje welcoming thousands in theirs. (Did you notice that I wrote “received” by Danderyd and “welcomed” by Södertälje?). Danderyd as municipality is not active in regard to other issues which demand the attention, involvement and commitment of many other parts of the nation… Somehow Danderyd is in a deep slumber while it has drawn a Silver Curtain around itself to isolate itself from the rest of us, this picture brings back to memory how once upon a time Eastern Europe separated itself from the rest by an Iron Curtain.

Danderyd, when will you wake up? Bob Dylan’s song “When you gonna wake up?” might give some food for thought:

You got men who can’t hold their peace and woman who can’t control their tongues. The rich seduce the poor and the old are seduced by the young. – Do you ever wonder just what God requires? You think He’s just an errand boy to satisfy your wandering desires.- You can’t take it with you and you know that it’s too worthless to be sold. They tell you, ‘Time is money’ as if your life was worth its weight in gold.

Chorus: When you gonna wake up, when you gonna wake up? When you gonna wake up and strengthen the things that remain?

That’s the Way I see it!



4 responses to “The distorted reality of Danderyd’s identity, they are ” their kind of people!”

  1. Without Danderyd’s extensive “give-away”-program Södertälje wouldn’t afford to take care of all their refugees, as Danderyd gives about 900 000 000 SEK ($1,3 billion) each year to other municipalities. When you say that we, who live in Danderyd just care about ourselves I start to wonder if I can regard your words as anything but pure stupidity.

  2. Dear Sebastian, I appreciate your comment and it is good for us (the rest of the world) to know that Danderyd is at least financially supporting some of the other (poorer) municipalities. But again, it is, as we all know, easier to pay-off our direct responsibility. This is even the case in families where parents are career-driven and pay-off their bad conscious towards their children by offering money or other things they might desire to compensate their lack of actual involvement.

    I have a feeling that this is done in the different municipalities which have not been open to embracing “new Swedes” – or the refugees.

    The refugee issue was an example, but I am afraid it might be one of many. If not, tell me /show me and I will stand corrected! Thanks again, John

  3. Good discussion! Danderyd is quite nice, from my own perspective similar to Palo Alto, California, where we have a number of friends…Yet we live in some of those slightly “messier” places, according to the poll…I appreciate the comment within the Fokus article, that there may be other criteria to consider to decide if a locality is a “good place to live”, good as others see it, good as maybe even God sees it…My reaction is to stand up and cheer for my fellow human brothers and sisters in Haparanda, and say ” Bravo to all among you who work hard to make this northern city your home, no doubt filled with good things and values that some folk in Lomma and Lund would appreciate!”…//stewart

  4. There is a difference between “new Swedes” and refugees. If my memory serves me right, only about 5% of the former belong to the latter.

    Also, there is a difference between “welcoming refugees” and the self-destruction that Södertälje has effectively started. When you have too many immigrants from one culture in one area, the integration into the Swedish society is replaced by the forming of a new (or rather “old”) society. And then, things like this happen: (note especially the politically correct police officer in the end. Unfortunately, I don’t think his words represent the reality in a faithful manner…)
    …and I could go on forever.

    Of course, Danderyd is to be blamed for its egoism. But opening up all the doors and windows (and cracks in the wall) to people who are used to the ten-eyes-for-an-eye (or any other very non-peaceful) way of living is not the solution.

    And before you yell “You racist scum,” please note that I am only trying to balance out your post. I’ve deliberately left out all the points where I agree with you 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s